<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

Validitas Konvergen Sub-skala Mania dan Sleep Problem Pada Dsm- 5 Level 1 Cross-cutting Symptom Measure (CCSM)

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Universitas Islam Indonesia

DOI

Abstract

A balance between mental and physical health is critical as both are interconnected and determine the quality of life of a person. Caring for mental health also contributes to healthy social relationship and builds a more caring society. Comprehensive mental health screening is important to ensure that individuals who need treatment can receive appropriate and effective attention. The development of mental health screening tools in Indonesia can help to entirely improve psychological services and mental health. One measuring tool that is capable of comprehensively measuring mental health problems is the DSM-5 Level 1 Cross-Cutting Symptom Measure (CCSM) scale. However, this scale has not been validated in Indonesian, thus needing to be validated to make it able to be used convincingly. This study aims to test the convergent validity of the CCSM scale, especially the mania and sleep problems subscales on the CCSM with other scales that have the same construct and have been previously validated. The CCSM mania subscale has been validated with The 7 Up Inventory (7U) scale with the results of both being weakly correlated (r=0.267) but within the same construct (RMSEA=0.072; SRMR=0.037 & CFI=0.950). The screening results also showed convergence between the two CCSM and 7U mania subscales (η2=0.033). Furthermore, the CCSM sleep problem sub-scale was validated with the Sleep Problem Scale, both of which were strongly correlated (r=0.667) and were in the same construct (RMSEA=0.026; SRMR=0.010 & CFI=0.999). The screening results also showed convergence between the two CCSM sleep problem subscales and the sleep problem scale (η2=0.328). Future researchers can focus on item weighting and use a comparison scale with clear cut-off values validated by psychologists.

Description

Citation

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By