The Urgency Of Alternative Threats And Probation In The Application Of The Death Penalty

Abstract

This study aims to determine the normative framework of The Urgency Of Alternative Threats And Probation In The Application Of The Death Penalty, because the existence of this concept raises debates and problems. Both the existence of which is doubtful conceptually and the effectiveness of the application. The formulation of the problem in this research is What the urgence of alternative threats and probation in the application of the death penalty? And What is the ideal concept of implementing death penalty from the perspective of sentencing theories and human rights? This type of research is normative with an instrumental approach method which is then supported by empirical data. The urgency of Alternative Threats And Probation In The Application Of The Death Penalty is not fundamentally philosophical, juridical and sociological. Second, the lack of clarity of conception, so that it will potentially cause problems in its enforcement. Third, a review of norms must be carried out by considering the aspects of progressive legal reform. Fourth, the state is obliged to make progressive and special policies for cases of serious crimes other than the application of the death penalty.