<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

The Effect of E-Lifestyle and Financial Literacy on the Consumer Behavior of University Students in Yogyakarta (Accounting and Non-Accounting Majors)

dc.Identifier.NIM22312124
dc.contributor.authorPutri, Salsabila Devina Yuli
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-15T08:49:04Z
dc.date.available2026-08-15T08:49:04Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractThis study investigates the determinants of consumptive behavior among university students in Yogyakarta, examining e-lifestyle and financial literacy as primary predictors alongside the moderating role of academic background across Accounting and Non-Accounting Majors. Using cross-sectional survey data from 120 active students across 17 universities in the Special Region of Yogyakarta (2025), Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) via SmartPLS 4.0 was employed to test main effects, while Multigroup Analysis (MGA). The study evaluates whether e-lifestyle, financial literacy, and academic background influence students' consumptive behavior, grounded in the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB). The findings show that e-lifestyle has a positive and significant effect on consumptive behavior (β = 0.337; t = 3.592; p = 0.000), indicating that deeper immersion in the digital ecosystem amplifies consumption tendencies. Financial literacy demonstrates a significant negative effect (β = -0.540; t = 8.322; p = 0.000) and emerges as the most dominant predictor in the model (f2 = 0.484), underscoring its role as the most effective internal control mechanism against consumptive impulses. The moderation analysis reveals that e-lifestyle has a positive and significant effect among Accounting students (β = 0.593; p = 0.000) but is non-significant among Non-Accounting students (β = -0.037; p = 0.728). Financial literacy, however, exerts a significant negative effect in both groups, with a substantially stronger impact among Non-Accounting students (β = -0.811; t = 23.770) than Accounting students (β = -0.336; t = 3.379). The model explains 39.7% of the variation in consumptive behavior (R2 = 0.397). These results extend agency theory by demonstrating that the quality of financial literacy matters more than its formal source, and contribute to financial socialization theory by showing that self-directed financial learning produces stronger behavioral outcomes than structured curricular exposure. The study suggests that non-Accounting universities should prioritize integrating financial literacy education into their xvi programs, while Accounting students require heightened critical awareness of digital stimuli that trigger overconsumption.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/66076
dc.publisherUniversitas Islam Indonesiaen_US
dc.subjecte-lifestyle, financial literacy, consumptive behavior, university students, PLS-SEM, multigroup analysis, Theory of Planned Behavior.en_US
dc.titleThe Effect of E-Lifestyle and Financial Literacy on the Consumer Behavior of University Students in Yogyakarta (Accounting and Non-Accounting Majors)en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
22312124.pdf
Size:
1.19 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections